The ability for students to take exams remotely has become a big discussion due to the current pandemic. This session conducts review of reports that can be run in ExamSoft to aid in the investigation of cheating allegations, discuss the policies and procedures that two programs had to update with the move to remote proctoring, review how faculty are trained to proctor in the remote environment, and lastly review how allegations of cheating are handled if an exam is proctored remotely. Programs share documents including student policies and procedures and faculty proctoring guidance with participants.
![]() |
Kimberly K. Daugherty, Pharm.D., Ph.D., BCPS
Associate Dean of Academic Affairs and Assessment, Sullivan University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences |
![]() |
Ashley Castleberry, Pharm.D., M.Ed.
Clinical Associate Professor and Division Head, University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy |
![]() |
Sarah Raake, Pharm.D., MS.Ed., BCACP, LDE
Associate Professor and Director of Institutional Effectiveness, Sullivan College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences |
In 2014, the College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences at Sullivan University decided to optimize testing in its PharmD program. After making the switch from paper-based exams to digital assessment with ExamSoft, the ...
For faculty at many academic institutions, research and publication in peer-reviewed journals is a precursor to employment, a necessary step for promotion, and a requirement to secure and maintain tenure. But the impo...
Pandemic-induced challenges have pushed higher ed institutions to grapple with virtual learning modalities. Educators and students have learned that investing in the right technological solutions can lead to more resi...